Response to 3 students posting with 2 references each Coursework - 1

Response to 3 students posting with 2 references each - Coursework ExampleTherefore, through the actualise of various articles on the subject, I strongly agree that perhaps a major factor that creates hurdles in dealing with these public policy issues is land itself. As emphasized by Liverani (2009) that democracies can be notoriously shortsighted when dealing with long term issues (par. 4). The rationale for this could be that there are denumerable external factors that could influence diverse issues and so policy makers opt to decide on the most pressing issues given the resources and current macro environmental side of the time.The post was also in response to Dinesh Sahs Post where we both saw the issue of conform toing democracies as recommending policies more on a short leash (Liverani, 2009). Sandras contention, however, focused on the culture of instant gratification which is also a valid point. According to Rivenburg (2004), part of the problem is that technology and seltzer culture have trained people to expect instant gratification of their desires. So when a temptation comes along, theyre inclined to indulge it (par. 12). There is so often focus on immediate outcome and results with little foresight being accorded to long term vision of the effects of ones course of action. Therefore, to see policy-makers in a democratic society to manifest behaviors which exhibit the culture of instant gratification would also explain the lack of forbearance and foresight to aim climate action on a more lasting and effective manner.De Yudices post was interesting in terms of illuminating the power of state at its best. Despite the apparent support from various policymakers and different stakeholders of the DREAM Act, the Senate reportedly made the firm decision of seeing it as a curse to being a precursor to invite more illegal aliens and encourage illegal immigration. As policymakers, democratic forces encourage making